12 angry men boy is innocent

12 angry men character analysis

And for someone who is so keen to challenge prejudice, the white-suited liberal seems pretty keen on it himself. Juror 8 calmly retorts, "You don't really mean you'll kill me, do you?

Essays may be lightly modified for readability or to protect the anonymity of contributors, but we do not edit essay examples prior to publication. Advertisement AND The woman across the street saw only a blur without her glasses, yet positively identified The Kid, again, either deliberately lying or confabulating.

I am sure he did not care to look at the title of the movie. He's slipping through our fingers! The example essays in Kibin's library were written by real students for real classes.

12 angry men ending

Marshall continues to state that he does not believe the boy's alibi, which was being at the movies with a few friends at the time of the murder, because the boy could not remember what movie he had seen when questioned by police shortly after the murder. Juror 8 cannily asks Juror 4 if he wears his eyeglasses to sleep, and Juror 4 admits that he does not wear them nobody does. Think of this, how could a young boy do this to his father? Final closing arguments having been presented, a visibly bored judge instructs the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty of murder. Advertisement AND The Kid really did go to the movies, but was so upset by the death of his father and his arrest that all memory of what he saw vanished from his head. Is he guilty beyond the shadow of a doubt? The future of this young boy is in your hands now, make the right decision.

Moreover, he had bought a knife, similar to the murder weapon, in a neighbourhood junk shop shortly before the incident.

Rated 6/10 based on 4 review
Why was the boy found not guilty in 12 angry men