How to critque a research paper

This produced an ordinal level data set. What is are the major finding s?

Research critique guidelines

Conclusion Your critique paper should end with an overview of the articles argument, your conclusions and your reactions. Materials and Methods Similar to a recipe, the description of materials and methods will allow others to replicate the study elsewhere if needed. It would have also been possible to actually go to individual schools and meet with the coaches as a group to administer surveys. This method would have given a good cross-section of gender and coaching experience for a variety of sports. Are recommendations for future action made? By increasing the number of independent variables to include things such as coaching experience and gender of the athletes, the researchers could have reduced some of the potential threats to internal validity. Certain coaching styles are more applicable for individual sports wrestling, track, and tennis than for team sports football, soccer, and basketball. Perhaps obtaining permission to administer the survey during these meetings would have been possible. Introduction This should include: Evidence of a literature review that is relevant and recent, critically appraising other works, not merely describing them Background information to the study, to orientate the reader to the problem Hypothesis or aims of the study Rationale for the study that justifies its need, i. Remember to jot down questions and thoughts that come to mind as you are reading. There are a number of other factors that could effect the internal validity of the study, yet were not addressed by the researchers.

If the program has had several losing seasons in a row, perhaps the attitude of the coach could be different than that of a coach who has recently won a state title.

Steps for Writing an Effective Critique Paper While these tips are designed to help students writing a psychology critique paper, many of the same principles apply to writing critiques in other subject areas as well.

how to critique a research proposal

A MANOVA was again used to analyze the data for any interaction between gender and coaching level with regard to overall leadership behavior. Communication difficulties arise even when a translator is available, and non-verbal messages may be missed by the patient or even by the health professional.

Is each result discussed in terms of its agreement or disagreement with previous results obtained by other researchers in other studies? Does the sample size meet the suggested guideline for minimum sample size appropriate for the method of research represented?

In general, females scored much higher than did the male coaches. The ecological generaliziability for the study is fairly high. Organize your paper carefully and be careful not to jump around from one argument to the next.

Introduction Begin your paper by describing the journal article and authors you are critiquing. When the six leadership styles were examined separately, there was a significant difference in social support between males and females.

Rated 6/10 based on 105 review
How to Critique a Research Article